Lower-intensity statin combo may benefit high-risk patients

Patients who do not tolerate or respond to higher-intensity statins may benefit from lower-intensity statin therapy along with either bile acid sequestrants or ezetimibe, findings from a study published online Feb. 11 in Annals of Internal Medicine suggest.

Researchers led by Kimberly Gudzune, MD, MPH, of Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, sought to compare a combination of lower-intensity statins with high-intensity statin monotherapy for benefits, harms and adherence. They conducted a review of randomized clinical trials through July 2013 and included the trials with adults at high risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD)—defined as having a low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level of 190 mg/dl or higher, pre-existing ASCVD or diabetes mellitus—that compared the lower-dose and higher-dose statin regimens.

Data from 36 studies suggested that using low-intensity statins along with a bile acid sequestrant decreases LDL cholesterol between 0 percent and 14 percent more than using one mid-intensity drug in patients with hyperlipidemia. Mid-intensity statin use along with ezetimibe (Zetia, Merck) decreased LDL cholesterol between 5 percent to 15 percent more than high-intensity monotherapy in patients with ASCVD and 3 percent to 21 percent more in patients with diabetes mellitus.

There was not enough evidence to assess long-term clinical outcomes, adherence and harmful effects for any of the therapy regimens or to evaluate fibrates, niacin or omega-3 fatty acids.

The authors acknowledged that some of the trials did not last long, had many dropouts, were not blinded and did not evaluate long-term clinical benefits or harms. However, they urged caution with the lower-intensity regimens.

“Clinicians could consider using lower-intensity statin combined with bile acid sequestrant or ezetimibe among high-risk patients intolerant of or unresponsive to statins; however, this strategy should be used with caution given the lack of evidence on long-term clinical benefits and harms,” they wrote.

Kim Carollo,

Contributor

Around the web

Eleven medical societies have signed on to a consensus statement aimed at standardizing imaging for suspected cardiovascular infections.

Kate Hanneman, MD, explains why many vendors and hospitals want to lower radiology's impact on the environment. "Taking steps to reduce the carbon footprint in healthcare isn’t just an opportunity," she said. "It’s also a responsibility."

Philips introduced a new CT system at ECR aimed at the rapidly growing cardiac CT market, incorporating numerous AI features to optimize workflow and image quality.

Trimed Popup
Trimed Popup